"Zim Math News" on this Page
Zim Olson's Existential Synopsis
Systems and/or Sub Systems as Expressed
A Mathematically Dominant Paradigm
Explanation of Systems and Sub Systems Concepts
Four Behavioral Components for any Existential System / Object: Every object has a functional context, Every(x); a System and no Sub System functionality Any(x) or f(x); A Non stated functionality, Non(x); and a resultant intersecting functionality, Some(x).
Historical: These concepts have been used throughout known History. These terms have been to a large extent implicit in our understanding; Theologies, knowledge, knowledge theory, law, businesses and economies. These and other understandings have laid claim to various portions of the system and/or sub system paradigm.
Current Perspective on Systems and Usage: Science utilizes the System functionality portion of this paradigm. Theologies still utilize this paradigm for a principal system, but do not agree on the existence or content of the behavioral components. 'Earthly' disciplines such as business, government, Information sciences, utilize and recognize the behavioral components but have not come to terms on their existential basis.
Systems and/or Sub Systems as Dominant Mathematical Paradigm: Zim Mathematics describes every object as possessing these behavioral components, including operations, numeric, unknown objects, and qualitative object and/or object(s). And that every of these object(s) can be expressed as a System and/or Sub System with varying existential results. Physical, qualitative, time attributes, illness and death are simply a partial system expression.
Origin of System Components and Expression Dynamic:
f(1) + - / × => f(0) + - / × => f(1+0) + - / × => f(1,0)= + - / ×
giving this tenet below for any object expressed as a complete System or completely expressed Sub System
g(1) + - / × = g(0) + - / × = g(1+0) + - / × = g(1,0)= + - / ×
Unknown operations as complete Systems are said to be also applicable with these numerical values.
These expressions are develop able and reducible within an open domain and a principal logic
Complete and simultaneous system(s) expression of numeric object(s) one as singular,
paired, and multiple objects could give a principal numeric object(s) zero (0)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_, _0_ .
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) _1_ = _0_, _0_, . .. _0 _
The "Original State"
Omniscience, Omni sapience, Omnipresence for all Object(s) as Expressed
Open Domain Source, Non Expressed
___, ___ .
___, ___, . . . ___ .
Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___
Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___, ___.
Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___ = ___, ___, . . . ___.
Below Expressed/Non-Expressed and Mathematically or Existentially combined as complete/incomplete, like/unlike, known/unknown, terms giving a Knowledge source to Existential and/or Lawful behavior.
Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___, ___.
Every(__)Any(__)Some(__)Non(__) ___, ___, . . . ___.
Pseudo Systems or “Named” Expression Outline and Construct Source. Pseudo Expression Trees as with Earthly Creation, give omission categories of intelligence processes. Or a source to "Satan". Giving also source to our perceived "unique" Items and/or Events and their perceived Time Expression(s) of Pseudo Domains.
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_) (__, __, ... __) = __.
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_) (__, __) = __.
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_) (__) = __.
Principal Expression Outline and Construct Source
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)(__) =(__, __, ... __)
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)(__) =(__, __)
Every(_)Any(_)Some(_)Non(_)(__) = __.
Outline of Expression Variations or Operational Expression Variations
This gives the following available Pseudo Objects and/or Principal Expression Object(s):
X, Xx, Xy, X1, X0, X(1,0), X(1+0), B, C, D, 1, 0, (1,0), (1+0), A-Z, =, ≠, +, - , ÷, ×, __, __ __ , __ __ .. __, N, 1-N, 1-∞, and, or, and/or,
Expression combinations of these Pseudo and/or Principal outlines represent sources to all contemporary (and otherwise) paradigms of knowledge. Expression combinations of principal numeric objects, 1,0,1+0, 1 and/or 0, as systems reveal expression domain sources that explain contemporary physical expression domains such as for Beginnings, Endings, Series, Terminal Series, Infinite Series, Events, Non-Events, True/False, Success/Failure, Luck/Bad Luck, .... Time, Space, Time/Space Relativity, Gravity, better than the physical sciences have described themselves .. Expression of object and /or objects as some form of exhaustive parameterization construct or "A-Z", could give recognizable and identifiable variations of "E=MC2" expressions. These expressions of course also give our sources to system(s) Logic and corresponding functionalities.
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __, ... __)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X)Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__, __)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __, ... __) = (__)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__, __) = (__)
Every(X)Any(X)Some(X)Non(X) Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)NonZ)(__) = (__)
Unit-Verse Knowledge Model
where Sum Total of object/objects Outcome(s) give Dysfunction Any System Outcome
where any principal and some partial expressions give "The Bomb"...Alternative principal and/or pseudo Exressions are clearly evident in Zim Mathematics and Expression Math
Inverted Unit-Verse Expression Outline
where any Principal Expression(s) give complete Access for "Soulution" for any problem
and where Principal and/or Partial Soulutions are always accessible.
System(s) Time Expression
Every(__)Any(+)Some(__)Non(__) Numeric Partial Time System Expression
Every(W)Any(X)Some(Y)Non(Z) Earth-Mankind System
giving unique expression outcome for any time expression
History of any Items/Events outline, where ( ) expression indicate systems expression of partial or complete, like or unlike, known or unknown, object or objects by any possble combination of given outline expression.
(( ) , ( ))
((( ) , (( )) . . . ( )))
(((( ) , ((( )) , (( ))) . . . ( ))))
((((( ) , (((( )) , ((( ))) , (( )))) . . . ( )))))
(((((( ) , ((((( )) , (((( ))) , ((( )))) , (( ))))) . . . ( ))))))
((((((( ) , (((((( )) , ((((( ))) , (((( )))) , ((( ))))) , (( )))))) . . . ( )))))))
IQ or Intelligence may be modeled as Expressions of Expressions or Expression-ability within the same ( ) system criteria. And useful communication modeling may be attained with the same ( ) expression criteria of object and / or objects giving ( ) variable pseudo and / or principal expressed object and/or objects.
Non Events in our experience also include mortality. Maybe this is the source to our fascination with the phenomena of“Luck”. But we are becoming more aware of our corporal or life event(s)/non-event(s), item(s)/event(s) consisting of more expressible substance than the qualitative constructs of our perception(s). Experience as System, Sub System, System andSub System, and System and/or Sub System are within our true corporal as well as Mathematical domain(s). System(s) Math can explain how-why for every expressed “luck” event , there is a “Bad Luck” non-event.
Earth(Men1 and/or Men0)Every(_) Any(+) Some(_)Non(_)
Dollar concepts can enhance our Economic modalities
The Real Uni-Verse
=> As Expressed
Additional Expression Sources or IQ/Knowledge Sources to Mankind
Pseudo System(X) Principal System(Y)
Pseudo System(X) Principal System(X)
Expressed 1; 0; 1+0; 1 and/or 0; in various combinations of object or object(s) and as giving various combinations of object or object(s). Exhaustive but variable construct(s) expressions of object(s) and/or object that give outcomes of like/combined attribute(s), could give sources to additional principal system logic/tenets.
Zim Olson's Existential Synopsis
I imagine there will ALWAYS be more explaining to do for a System(s) and/or Sub System(s) as Expressed Paradigm. And in case not noted by reader, this is considered within "open domain(s)". Otherwise I consider this paradigm is fairly well set in "Stone" or at least Zim Mathematics "html".
Zim Math Super Bowl outcome prediction - (Broncos + God) + (Seahawks + God) => ___ + ___. ___ + ___, ___, ... ___ .
See Expressions Math Page for available expressions and outcome. Please don't use this information to bet on game outcome. Only principal and not pseudo outcomes allowed.
1-19-2014 I want to thank American Mathematical Society (AMS), and the Mathematics Association of America (MAA) for the opportunity to exhibit agian this year at annual JMM 2014 in Baltimore MD, January 15-18, 2014. I estimate I talked to 1,000 to 1,100 JMM attendees. Distributing 800 DVDs or sets of DVDs and handing out flyers and business cards. As I told these attendees at my exhibit table this year, Zim Mathematics, with my system(s) approach of Creative Math, Art, Math, and other paradigms, I believe I have developed new basis for Math and general knowledge theory. This includes systems concepts and expression outlines I document in my web site and material provided at my exhibit. The utility of my work is readily apparent after not very much review. Source to contemporary Pseudo knowledge paradigms, Principal knowledge paradigms, and Principal and/or Pseudo knowledge paradigms are readily identifiable and recognizable. All contemporary knowledge paradigms can be seen to fall within my Systems concepts and their expression outlines. Contemporary paradigms can be seen as simply an expression portion of my systems outlines and where other possible additional knowledge can be readily visualized.
Zim Olson's Exhibit Booth 523 at JMM 2014
Zim Olson outside Baltimore Convention Center at JMM 2014
The winners of the JMM 2014 Zim Mathematics T-shirt Raffle are in the following Cities/States and Zips. The winners will be mailed their T-shirts before I leave Baltimore MD.
Atwater CA 93301
Setauket NY 11733
Washington DC 200360-1466
Hernon VA 20170
Marina CA 93937
Statesboro GA 30458
Chicago IL 60616
San Antonio TX 78249
Indianola IA 50125
Statesboro GA 30460
"The Good News" or "Gospel" as taught in New Testament of the Bible (According to my best recollection) is the "Good News" because it is Good News to all creatures on Earth. Any other representation of this "Gospel" is a different Good News as Jesus taught as shown in New Testament. Any other such representation probably utilizes Earthly or Pseudo domains of "Selection/Omission" methodologies of intelligence. As stated in my new topic of "Expression Mathematics" , intelligence is said to consist primarily of functional expressions of Expression/Non-Expression. Utilization of open domain source in functional development and functional reducibility make possible access to such "Good News".
I Think "Holly Weird" needs some competition. I propose Zim Math Movie Productions where Numeric/Principal Numeric, Complete/Partial, Like/Unlike, Known/Unknown, Object/Objects.....where expression(s) of Expression(s) of Movie Expression(s) are of open domain complete develop-ability and complete reducibility. See Expression Mathematics Page.
New Math Story Topic, "The ongoing struggle between the Bit(s) and the Byte(s), How will this struggle end? Who will be victorious?".
Here is a list of new possible topics for Zim Math. Law System(s) - Consisting of unlimited law(s), laws(1-N), laws(1-10), laws(x), Laws(1), laws(0), laws((1+0), laws(1,0)....or laws(1) and/or laws(0) and/or laws((1+0) and/or laws(1,0)? What does this say about some of our contemporary Law(s) systems?
Another topic I am thinking of doing, is a "System and/or Sub System" flow chart of various forms of Principal and/or "Principal" (pseudo systems), systems. The main feature of this flow chart I wish to incorporate is the initial query: "System and/or Sub System?" Or ___ = ___ = ___ = ___ ?
Zim Olson at his Desk in October 2012
Copyright 2014 Zim Olson & Zim Mathematics - Creative Math and Art. New Math Foundations & Logic. All rights reserved.