Systems Interpretations. Math Foundation & Logic.
Systems Concepts & Outlines of contemporary and recognized knowledge, paradigms, math and art object(s) give us new Math Foundations and Logic.
New Origins, tenets, applications readily achievable.
Provides us necessary Analysis, Rationale AND/Or Viable Outcome(s).
Thoughts Today: The importance of the Mathematical Holy (7) Sequence may be found in the identification of 4 primary/principal numerics in this pseudo/partial sequence. Making it a potential principal expression(s) of a recognized Earthly-Mathematics pseudo/partial expression of expression(s). The Beginning as Principal Numeric 1 is of course an essential Earthly/Heavenly structure. And a completion by some principal/primary numeric gives a principal/partial expression(s) of completion. f (1) =>f (0) =>f (1+0) =>f (1.0) as object and/or object(s) as applicable within any domain. For any A,B,C … Z, A-Z, 2,3 4, … N.
This is my version of Creative Mathematics.
I utilize documentations by my systems concepts of contemporary knowledge, science, and recognized or not so recognized History. I claim none of these interpretations are new but have been utilized only implicitly / explicitly. My systems outline(s) document these interpretations as explicit / more explicit. Omitted information in the Earthly and otherwise Knowledge systems(s) easily identifiable. Corresponding outcomes also realized. Mathematical availability of numeric object(s) 1,0 1 0r 0, 1+0, 1 and/or 0 as principal system numerics, makes parametrization of systems concepts with these variations. Such as uni-versal beginnings or endings, completeness, etc . Implied orderings or hierarchy need no longer be implied for such systems parameters. These principal numeric systems objects expressed in object(s) variation may enable a space science and space mathematics. Zim Math Paradigm of object(s) express-able as systems although now implied/explicit, explains the perceived phenomena of time as consisting of systems of omitted information.
Zim Mathematics gives in outline form(s) systems interpretation of math object(s), art object(s), and knowledge object(s). Documenting tenets, concepts, origins, foundations with additional lawful logic of recognized knowledge. In past, present and future and systems context variations, combinations.
With my creative methodologies, of cartoons, Math Stories, games, Math Art, poetry etc., I have developed a mathematically dominant paradigm I term as the Systems and/or Sub Systems as expressed paradigm for all object and/or objects. Outlines of recognize-able knowledge topics within Systems outlines and concepts give unique perspectives to so called fundamentals of knowledge, science and Mathematics.
Zim Math states and documents that with the availability of 47 Billion universally applicable systems constructs to any math, art, or knowledge object(s), Systems analysis is essential to attain any measure of viability. Object(s) express-ability and variabilities will give more knowledge express-ability. AND this will give more domain space to Truth + Expression(s).
This Zim Mathematics Systems Math + Logic can serve as the Economic Engine of All Economic Engines. The idea of mathematical systems mining is now plausible. And in a typical creative moment of Zim’s, I saw this as providing a dominant System(s) weaponry with outcomes of principal / principle express-ability within principal / principle domains. Knowledge unit Knowledge mapping for systems express-ability as math option. … This outline serves also as a general system, principal, partial, and open domains measure of rationale. Systems Math documents “Jesus Walking on Water” easily as Mathematics documents 2 + 2 = 4.
Zim Mathematics: Mathematics with explicit systems interpretation is at least 10,000 years overdue. My systems outlines of recognized math object(s) quickly provides much needed additional perspectives to math knowledge and knowledge in general. I am known to tell others I expect Zim Math to be 100 percent successful, but on retrospection I think this is not quite accurate. And a more than 110 percent success rate is more true. This is explained with the abundant availability of systems interpretation content in my work which can be readily adapted to contemporary mathematics in unpredictable and incalculable ways. As a result, many amazing touchdowns will be made as an outcome of this content.
“Adam” from the Bible said I AM like G-d. I am Special and chosen. AND assumed ownership of his express-ability. His Expression of Expression(s) Manifested in our Earthly Kingdom of knowledge. All The Fruit(s) of our labor assumed the same terminal form. Jesus showed us the Way with object(s) express-ability as Principal Object(s) One AND / Or _0_. As stated, and expressed, All Things are Feasible.
“The Kingdom Power and Glory Forever and Ever.” F(1,0) = __, __, … __.
With the availability of Systems express-ability It occurred to me I may have omitted an important pseudo express-ability. This is Math Poetry or Systems Math Poetry. Putting constraints of the pseudo dictionaries aside this could prove to be a very powerful form of Mathematics along other art form variations.
Zim Mathematics perceives a major flaw of contemporary science lays in its foundations of pseudo-outcomes of measurability, with a total disregard to origins or sources of principal / principle express ability. Zim Math documents the use of systems outlines by science and other recognized paradigms, but entirely implicitly / explicitly. Omission methodologies considered the dominant Earthly knowledge methodology. Some say this satanic Earthly method does not exist, which could be true, because it can be shown the information is always present.
Expressions as Mathematical Domain, Object(s), Variations.
1 +1 = __ and/or __, __ and/or __, __ … __. AND / Or
Also as System Object(s), expressed / non-expressed:
Every( ) Any( ) Some( ) Non( )
Logic as ( expressed / non-expressed: )
Every( ) Any( ) Some( ) Non( ) / Every( ) Any( ) Some( ) Non( )
Every( ) Any( ) Some( ) Non( ) = Every( ) Any( ) Some( ) Non( )
Recognized Express-able object(s) or Systems Object(s)
1; 0; 1+0; 1,0; A; B; C; …; Z; A-Z; 2; 3; 4;… N; 1-N
Principal Object(s) Variations
Our Recognized Paradigms
Serie(s) and/or Event(s)
1,0,1+0,1 AND/Or 0 Creation or Life Creation
0, 1 or 0, X, A, B, C, …Z. Pro Choice Paradigm
1 or 0 => poker game logic, or Unit Verse as Expressed
1 AND/Or 0 Creation as expressed
0,1,1+0,1 AND/Or _0_ Big Bang Creation, Pro Choice
Time
1,2,3,…N
Physics
A,B,C,…Z
Science(X)
f(x) => f(__), f(x) => f(_1_), f(x) => f(_Y_), f(x) => f(__), f(__) …. f(__);
f(1) => f(__), f__) …. f(__); f(0) => f(__), f(__) …. f(__);
f(1+0) => f(__), f__) …. f(__); f(1+0) => f(_X_)
f(1 AND/Or _0_) => f(A)
….. ETC
Holy Seven Mathematics
Features of interest of this expression(s) outline below: The expressed sequence of “seven” days have omitted information. The Day(s) are expressed as a principal function. The Holy Seven Day Mathematics takes form as a complete principal variation-functional expression(s) of these “seven days”. Full principal develop-ability and math and logic, is assumed with this completely expressed outline. This result contrasts with a purely additive functionality of the seven days, which would not give complete develop-ability. Mathematically or otherwise. Zim Math documents the availability of 47 billion universally applicable systems concepts for any object(s). AND with mankind’s professed knowledge dominion of expression of expression(s) methodologies, this leaves us a perpetual Stuff analysis, rationale and Stuff Outcome kingdom.
One Example of Holy or Principally express-able experiences, Numerics, etc.
The importance of this Mathematical as Holy Sequence may be found in the identification of 4 primary/principal numerics in this pseudo/partial sequence. Making it a potential principal expression(s) of a recognized Earthly-Mathematics pseudo/partial expression of expression(s).
Mathematical Express-ability Options
Expression(s) of Principal object(s) giving recognized paradigm viability.
Expression(s) of Numerics, other pseudo principalities give us recognized mathematical paradigm.
f(1) = __ ; __, __; __, __, … ___.
f(0) = __ ; __, __; __, __, … ___.
f(1+0) = __ ; __, __; __, __, … ___.
f(1 or 0) = __ ; __, __; __, __, … ___.
f( 1 AND/Or _0_) = __ ; __, __ ; __, __, … ___.
f(1) = __ + __, __+__, __, … ___.
f(0) = __ +__, __+__, __, … ___.
f(1+0) = __ +__, __+__, __, … ___.
f(1 or 0) = __ +__, __ +__, __, … ___.
f( 1 AND/Or _0_) = __ + __, __ + __, __, … ___
f(1) = __ AND/Or __, __ AND/Or __, __, … ___.
f(0) = __ AND/Or __, __ AND/Or __, __, … ___.
f(1+0) = __ AND/Or __, __ AND/Or __, __, … ___.
f(1 or 0) = __ AND/Or __, __ AND/Or __, __, … ___.
f( 1 AND/Or _0_) = __ AND/Or __, __ AND/Or __, __, … ___
Pseudo/Numeric Expression(s) of above give recognized mathematics, principle, scientific paradigm
A; B; C; …; Z; A-Z; 2; 3; 4;… N; 1-N
f(1) = f(0) = f(1+0) = f(1 AND/Or)
Expression(s) vs As Expressed.
Reproductive Creation:
As Principal Expression(s)
An Object(s) source to “Soul”/Express-ability as viability.
Every(1)Any(+)Some(1AND/Or_0_)Non(0)
As Transformation
Every(A)Any(+)Some(1)Non(A)
Every(B)Any(+)Some(1)Non(B)
As Functional Completion
Every(A)Any(+)Some(1)Non(A)
Every(B)Any(+)Some(0)Non(B)
As Biblical “Born Again” – An Earthly/Principal Birth
Every(A)Any(+)Some(1AND/Or _0_)Non(A)
As Creation
Every(1AND/Or_0_)Any(1AND/Or_0_)Some(1AND/Or_0_)Non(1AND/Or_0_)
Thoughts on Education:
During my undergrad days it was discussed and known that students of Mathematics and Computer Science, along with Liberal Arts training such as Science, Arts etc. had sometimes a tendency to go over the edge on contemporary knowledge paradigms. Then as in my case, I am a reader and believer in Bible Principals / Principles… And was a little over the edge myself to start with. A Christian Biblical summary of education, “You can tell a Tree by its Fruit”. In my younger years I used to believe schools in general provided a genuine education. This focus appears to have been lost and fading.
Universe Art – Zim Mathematics
Expression of Expression(s) = > Principle Non-Function
Every( ) Any ( + ) Some ( A ) Non ( )
Every( ) Any ( + ) Some ( B ) Non ( )
—————————————–
Every(A-B) Any ( + ) Some ( C ) Non (A-B)
This interpretation – variation may explain some of our contemporary viewpoints of our day. The intersections of functional context, identified behavior of concern and the intersections with an open domain are expressed as some pseudo A, B, C. Where any Expression of Expression(s) may give a principle open domain or give us a terminal event(s) and/or serie(s) that cannot be expressed.
Thoughts for the day:
Quantity as Stuff Units? Object(s) as partial systems.
AND. Equality as System AND / Or Pseudo Sub System Equality.
Equity = Inequity, as Expressed.
Manipulating Data to fit Hypothesis/Conclusion is not in the Mathematician Dictionary.
Use Systems Math Analysis, Rationale for a System and/or Sub Systems Answer:
Why can’t two independent sixty-minute egg timers be used to measure120 minutes of time, independently?
An Original Science Tenet: Evidence AND/Or Faith. As Expressed… .
Mathematics (Creation, Knowledge, Jesus) as expression(s), as expressed, as within all domains, expressed/non-expressed.
Zim Olson – Denver Colorado USA
