American Mathematical Society
AMS – Fall Eastern Sectional – Virtual Meeting – October 25-26, 2025
I am currently participating in this meeting as I type. As a viewer only. I find this meeting and format very interesting!
10:08 AM 10/25/2025
I end up considering the content I have listened to and am listening to in the context of my own extensive work as Math and Art Object(s) within systems perspectives. Upon some of my own thinking I consider this as not only mathematically do-able, but very helpful in moving this kind of work forward. And hopefully not backward. Framing these math topics in terms of available systems concepts and recognizable systems components can be very useful in pursuing serious discussions of this type.
The Zim Mathematics Systems and/or Sub System(s) paradigm as expressed / non-expressed in object(s) variability will provide real time analysis very quickly to such discussions of mathematical topics. Comparison and Contrast of systems analysis across other math topics and paradigms, easily provides insight to what we are actually discussing. Such as real relationships of the Zim Math systems components within math topic variabilities. For example: The important systems component (Some(x)) representing functional intersection of other System components and attributes takes on many forms when considering the many math topics. But it can also be readily seen as how this plays out within math topic variation and other familiar important knowledge paradigms.
The talks of Graph theory demonstrate math development as exercise in evident developable domains, lack any systems perspective or analysis within possible relationships of functional context(s), math-functionalities and non stated outcomes. Domain development remains limited by implied only systems component intersection functionalities.
Identified omitted axioms in these exercises could consist of a system(s) developability and reducibility functionality. There may be a variety of ways to accomplish this. Object(s) variation as principal express-ability could achieve this domain and function(s) developable / reducible functional axiom(s).
Some (X) providing Functional Intersection(s) of Expressed/Non-Expressed System(s)
1 = __ and/or __. __ and/or __, __, …. __.
0 = __ and/or __. __ and/or __, __, …. __.
1 or 0 = __ and/or __. __ and/or __, __, …. __.
1 + 0 = __ and/or __. __ and/or __, __, …. __.
1 , 0 = __ and/or __. __ and/or __, __, …. __.
_______________________________
as Expressed / Non-Expressed
Could represent Space System(s). Cumulative. Etc.
I suppose above outline could be useful in representing a complete system and system components. As mathematical expression/expression(s).
Zim Olson
7:38 AM 10/26/2025
This is second day of this virtual math Meeting. My thoughts again on the two talks I have been listening to today. I notice heavy use of pre-existing paradigms in their talk development. Geometry, Time and some Physical / Physics constraints. I choose to utilize more mathematical constraints. Even for time and physical constraints I endeavor to utilize more basic foundations/logic. Some may think this is not feasible or tenable. But with more rigorous and systematic analysis of contemporary paradigms, I feel the existence of systemic issues in math and general knowledge. Of course I feel there is no awareness of systems concepts in knowledge or Math development. A chronic source to our knowledge issues/problems. I realized at prior MAA math meeting that the source to all irreconcilable logic can be tracked to our dominant methodology of expression of expression(s). This gives us the constant source of new information and corresponding omitted information.
Zim Mathematics and Systems Analytics: Use of Systems concepts and outlines. I attempt of include all systems concepts in my mathematical expression outlines. I also utilize constraints of viability vs limiting constraints. In my endeavors I expect all paradigms to be somehow includable within my systems math efforts. Principal expressed would be said to be developable / reducible with all info/domains considered. Principle expressed paradigms concerned only with partial systems expression and their domains.
2:39 AM 10/27/2025
Explanation of above . Systems as expressions. And object or object(s).
1= Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
0= Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
1+0= Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
1or0= Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
1,0= Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
Example Definition(s)
1= Apple
0 =Apple that was eaten, Non-Expressed System
1+0 = Apple as Applesauce, Physical Unconditional Logic.
1or0 = Apple or some menu item,
1,0 = 1 AND/Or 0 , as Systems And/or statement, expression, object(s). Complete behavioral expression(s).
Contemporary Expression(s)
Every( ) Any (+) Some ( ) Non ( )
Zim Math Principal/Principle Expression(s)
Every(X) Any (X) Some (X) Non (X
Every(A) Any (B) Some (C) Non (D)
Every( ) Any ( ) Some ( ) Non ( )
Every(1,0) Any (1,0) Some (1,0) Non (1,0))
Contemporary and Zim Math Space System(s) Expressions:
Contemporary Example: Every(A)Any(1/+1)Some(N)Non(A) – A Pseudo Infinity?
Zim Math Example: Systems/SubSystem(s) with Variable intersection component (1; 0; 1+0; 1or0; 1,0) and variable object(s) express-abilities.
Numeric / Pseudo Constructs provide familiar Space paradigm construct.
